Legal Opinion
People v. Pruitt
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jerome L. Reinstein, J.
Two interesting questions arose on the Wade (United States v Wade, 388 US 218) hearing conducted in the instant case. The first involves the claim that any undue delay in filing an accusatory instrument following an *915arrest which results in depriving a defendant of counsel at a corporeal identification, even assuming an otherwise unexceptionable viewing procedure, requires suppression of such pretrial identification testimony on the prosecution’s direct case. (Cf. Gilbert v California, 388 US 263.) The second requires the court to determine whether a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. ReevesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. GlaspieNew York Supreme Court · 1996