Legal Opinion
Grant v. Target Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 14, 2012No. 2:10-cv-823PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TERENCE P. KEMP, United States Magistrate Judge.
This employment discrimination case is before the Court to consider plaintiff Mark Grant’s renewed motion for leave to amend his complaint (Doc. # 29), defendant Target’s motion to compel discovery (Doc. # 30), Target’s motion to extend the discovery schedule (Doc. # 38), Target’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. #41), Target’s motion to strike four affidavits (Doc. #44), Target’s motion to schedule a status conference and final pretrial conference (Doc. # 52), Target’s motion to strike Mr. Grant’s opposition to Target’s motion…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- CHKRS, LLC v. City of DublinDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Joel Todd Marcum, et al. v. PNC Bank, National Association and C. Robert MarcumDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
- Powe v. Warden, Noble Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Sinomax USA, Inc. v. American Signature, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- The Manley Law Firm LLC, et al. v. Brent J. GibbsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.