Legal Opinion
Jersey City Redev. v. Weisenfeld
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 6, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
124 N.J. Super. 291 (1973)
306 A.2d 477
JERSEY CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE A. WEISENFELD AND ANNE WEISENFELD, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 30, 1973.
Decided June 6, 1973.
Before Judges CARTON, MINTZ and SEIDMAN.
Mr. Henry J. Wilewski argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Krieger and Chodash, attorneys).
Mr. Norman H. Roth argued the cause for respondents (Mesrs. Davis and Roth, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by MINTZ, J.A.D.
In…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. LanzaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- City of East Orange v. CrawfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- State v. LanzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- TWP. OF WAYNE v. CassatlyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Flama Const. Corp. v. Tp. of FranklinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- GGI Props., LLC v. City of Millville (In re GGI Props., LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Prol v. ProlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988