Legal Opinion

Prol v. Prol

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 15, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

KRAFTE, J.S.C.

By way of a post-judgment matrimonial motion concerning the issue of child custody, defendant-wife seeks to compel *395plaintiff-husband and plaintiffs mother to be evaluated by a psychologist chosen by defendant.

In a previous appearance before this court, defendant sought to modify the joint physical custody arrangement between the parties as to their son. Defendant also sought the appointment of a psychiatrist or psychologist to evaluate all parties involved with regard to any custody modification. Pursuant to R. 5:3-3, this court appointed a psychiatrist to conduct a custody…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LanzaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  2. Anzalone v. Anzalone Brothers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  3. Township of Wayne v. KosoffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  4. State v. LanzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. Jersey City Redev. v. WeisenfeldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API