Edinburg Irr. Co. v. Ledbetter
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.
The case, as -tried and ás disposed of by the honorable Court of Civil Appeals, involved numerous issues as between various groups of the 132 parties plaintiff on the one hand, and some one or more of the eight parties defendant. After the writ of error was allowed, the controversies between all of the parties, except J. W. Hoit (who was an original defendant, hut who sought relief against his codefendants by cross-action) and Edinburg Irrigation Company, W. E. Stewart, Stewart Farm Mortgage Company, W. É. Stewart Land Company, and Hidalgo Land Company, were settled by agreement. Various…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Martin v. Robinson, 67 Tex. 368 (Tex. 1887)Texas Supreme Court · 1887
- Imperial Irrigation Co. v. JayneTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Borden v. Trespalacios Rice & Irrigation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1905
- Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bennett v. Brown County Water Improvement District No. OneTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Marange v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- State v. Hidalgo County Water Control & Improvement District No. EighteenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Phillips v. the MacCabeesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Bray v. First Nat. Bank of MertzonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.