Legal Opinion

People v. Adams

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1987PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant complains that the trial court erred in charging the jury with respect to circumstantial evidence that some of the facts could be proved with less assurance than others. Although the language isolated by defendant was one of the bases for reversal in People v Ford (66 NY2d 428, 443), the charge as a whole adequately conveyed to the jury the appropriate standards (People v Ford, supra).

Defendant’s remaining contentions are not preserved for our review.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. GrazianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. BrazeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. People v. GereckeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API