Legal Opinion

Young v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1939No. Appeal, 17PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

In this workmen’s compensation case the referee made an award to claimants, parents of deceased, for partial dependency. This was sustained by the board and the court below. The insurance carrier has appealed to this court, and the only question which has been raised is whether deceased, a member of the Pennsylvania National Guard, disregarded positive orders of his employer, and consequently was not in the course of his employment at the time of his accidental death. See Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, art. 3, §301, 77 PS §411.

Deceased was a private in Headquarters…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dickey v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Molek v. W. J. Rainey, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Barkanich v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Chulick v. Logan Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wolsko v. American Bridge Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Kostello v. KostelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Walker v. Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API