Legal Opinion

Rudulph v. Burgin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 2, 1929No. 6 Div. 239PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaxre, J.

In its original form appellee’s bill sought relief on the averment — to state the substance of the bill very briefly' — that her intestate, who was her husband and the father of her infant children, who are named as joint party complainants, while insane and mentally incompetent attempted to convey described parcels of land to appellant, but that his conveyance was wholly void and of no effect. In her amended bill appellee— so to speak of Pauline E. Burgin — complained “individually and as administratrix” and the minor children are joined as suing by their next friend, the complainant above…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lehman v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  2. Patton v. BeecherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  3. King v. Livingston Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Montgomery v. McNuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Hale v. KinnairdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. LassetterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Gandy v. HaglerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Garrett v. First Nat. Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Meeks v. MeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. De Freese v. VanderfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API