Legal Opinion
De Freese v. Vanderford
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 24, 1929No. 7 Div. 897PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The final decree denied relief on the respective theories of the bill— that fraudulent dominance or undue influence was exercised (Cox v. Hale, 217 Ala. 46, 49, 114 So. 465); or that a resulting trust existed. It will not be necessary that the recognized distinctions between implications of a resulting trust and the legal presumptions of an implied or constructive trust be here considered. Rudulph v. Burgin, 219 Ala. 461, 122 50. 432; Hill v. Hill, 216 Ala. 435, 113 So. 306; Montgomery v. McNutt, 214 Ala. 692, 108 So. 752; Blanks v. Atkins, 217 Ala. 597, 117 So. 193; Sanders v. Steele, 124…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Patton v. BeecherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Montgomery v. McNuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gandy v. HaglerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Jacksonville Public Service Corp. v. Profile Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Sykes v. SykesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Garrett v. First Nat. Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Meeks v. MeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.