Legal Opinion
Culpepper v. Inland Mortgage Corp.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided February 7, 2006No. Nos. 2:96-CV-917-VEH, 2:98-CV-2187-VEHPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PLAINTIFFS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HOPKINS, District Judge.
Presently pending before this Court is the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 184) and the Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 188). For the reasons stated, the Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED and Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED.
*461 NATURE OF THE ACTION
This action is brought under Section 8 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2601, 2607. The Plaintiffs, who received FHA mortgage loans from Defendant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.