Legal Opinion

Bailey v. County of Riverside

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 7, 2005No. 03-56545, 03-57107PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal from a verdict and an award of attorneys’ fees in an action for excessive force under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and for negligence under California state law. The case arises from an episode in which the defendants, County of Riverside deputy sheriffs Frank Tiburzio and Gary Colbert, forcibly ejected the plaintiff, Ronald O. Bailey, from an adult bookstore and arrested him.

The principal issue on the merits relates to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury’s negligence verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants also contend the motion for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harolyn Pavao, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Jon Webster Pavao v. John Pagay County of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Larry Weyant, Charles Weyant v. George S. Okst, Irvin Richard Weber, Joseph Peter Auberger, Lawrence MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Members First Federal Credit Union, Louisville, Ky, Cross v. Members First Credit Union of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. County of RiversideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. China Fortune Land Development v. 1955 Capital Fund I GP LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API