Legal Opinion
China Fortune Land Development v. 1955 Capital Fund I GP LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 9, 2021No. 3:19-cv-07043Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHINA FORTUNE LAND Case No. 19-cv-07043-VC DEVELOPMENT, et al., Petitioners, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES, PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, AND POST-JUDGMENT 1955 CAPITAL FUND I GP LLC, et al., INTEREST Respondents. Re: Dkt. No. 112 The respondents’ motion for attorneys’ fees is granted in part and denied in part. The contracts between the parties authorize the respondents to seek fees for the appeal, the motion for an indicative ruling, and the motion for fees itself, and all of these requests are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Vincent McCalla v. Royal MacCabees Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Interdigital Communications Corp. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Bailey v. County of RiversideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005