Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Sumter County

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 6, 1939No. 14816PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

In that both sides to this controversy have appealed, we will hereafter refer to C. M. Hurst, respondent-appellant, as plaintiff, and to Sumter County et al. as defendant.

Plaintiff is the sheriff for Sumter County, and has been for a number of years, having been duly elected to this office, and qualified and commissioned on March 1, 1929, March 1, 1933, and on March 11, 1937. The plaintiff having abandoned the second cause of action relating to salary, we are concerned in this appeal with only the first cause of action in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gamble v. Clarendon CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  2. Salley v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  3. Craig v. Pickens CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. Ridgill v. Clarendon CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hampton v. DodsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. Henry v. Horry CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Sumter County v. HurstSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. Cannon v. Georgia Attorney General's OfficeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API