Legal Opinion

Cavazos v. Foster

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided May 21, 1993No. 4:92-cv-00055PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

QUIST, District Judge.

The named plaintiffs in this class action are forty two (42) migrant farm workers; They have brought this action against defendant William Foster Sr., doing business as the William Foster Company, (“Foster”), an agricultural enterprise that plants over 1000 acres in pickling cucumbers in the states of Michigan and Missouri. Plaintiffs claim that the defendant company pays less than minimum wages, provides substandard housing, and evades Social Security responsibilities with respect to members of the plaintiff class.

Plaintiffs have moved for partial summary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elizondo v. PodgorniakDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  2. Perez v. HowesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API