Legal Opinion

Clark v. Gardner

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided June 22, 2017No. 9:17-CV-0366PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION and ORDER

DAVID N. HURD, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an initial review óf a civil rights complaint brought pro se by plaintiff Jamel Clark (“Clark” or “plaintiff’). Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”).1 Plaintiff, who is presently con*160fined in the custody of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DOCCS”) at Attica Correctional Facility, has not paid the filing fee for this action and seeks leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. Dkt. No. 6 (“IFP Application”). Plaintiff also seeks appointment of pro bono counsel to represent him in this action. Dkt. No. 4.

II.…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ali Cisse v. Amber J. Bliss and R. PfluegerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026
  2. Anduze v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  3. GLADU v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
  4. GLADU v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
  5. Josey v. RamosDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API