Legal Opinion
Cano v. Davis
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 12, 2002No. CV 01-08477 MMM (RCx)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs, who are Latino voters and advocacy groups, challenge two congressional districts and one state legislative district adopted by the State of California as part of its most recent redistricting process. Plaintiffs contend that the three districts violate the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1973, and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, under various legal theories. These theories raise challenging questions regarding the applicability of voting rights doctrines developed in a…
3Cases cited60 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- Hall v. VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Rodriguez v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Session v. PerryDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2004
- Montes v. City of YakimaDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2014
- Perez v. AbbottDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.