Legal Opinion

Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. Eppes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 10, 1920No. 10292PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Certiorari; from Eulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. October 30, 1919. Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

This was a suit instituted in the municipal court of Atlanta, in October, 1918, by a policy or “covenant” holder against the above-styled fraternal beneficial association to recover premiums paid by him upon a certificate of insurance issued to him in January, 1909, and for interest upon each payment, and was based upon a breach of the contract by the insurer through a large increase in the rate of premium demanded and a decrease in certain substantial benefits under the certificate or “covenant”.

A principal and substantial element of the contract of insurance here involved was its feature of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ancient Order United Workmen v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Supreme Council American Legion of Honor v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Farrow v. State Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Wilson & Co. v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. Willis v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. McKinney v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Italian Society of Mutual Beneficence v. VacarellaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API