Legal Opinion
Pacific Automobile Ins. Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 1969No. Civ. 34022PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, J. pro tem. *
This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County to vacate and quash a subpoena duces tecum requiring production of documents in a discovery proceeding.
The proceeding arises out of an action filed by the County of Santa Barbara against petitioners and Raymond Ehrlich for money allegedly expended by the county for medical and related services rendered by the county to Ehrlich when he was injured in an accident with petitioner Lurie. In the first cause of action, based upon intentional interference with contract, it is alleged that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- D. I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- West Pico Furniture Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Shively v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Superior Ct.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- La Ronda Collins v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Greenberg v. Hollywood Turf ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Grannis v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Lee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.