State v. Brock
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for felon in possession of a firearm and possession of methamphetamine, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found in a search of his residence by police officers and his probation officer. Defendant challenges the search on two grounds: first, that his consent to the search was not voluntary and, alternatively, that his consent was tainted by a prior unlawful entry. We conclude that defendant’s consent was voluntary and that it did not derive from the earlier illegality. We therefore affirm.
Although some…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. FreundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 2026
- State v. TennantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017