Legal Opinion

State v. Brock

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 19, 2012No. 08CF072; A145257PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for felon in possession of a firearm and possession of methamphetamine, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found in a search of his residence by police officers and his probation officer. Defendant challenges the search on two grounds: first, that his consent to the search was not voluntary and, alternatively, that his consent was tainted by a prior unlawful entry. We conclude that defendant’s consent was voluntary and that it did not derive from the earlier illegality. We therefore affirm.

Although some…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. FreundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  2. State v. TennantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API