Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Patterson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1894No. 359PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from El Paso.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

The appellee brought this suit to recover damages, actual and exemplary, for requiring him to pay the sum of fifty cents as fare over the Pecos bridge. Plaintiff purchased at El Paso a 1000-mile ticket, for $25, over the Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Bailway lines, it being a contract signed by plaintiff, and among other provisions it had written upon it in legible letters, “Not good over Pecos bridge,” and also providing, that no agent or employe of any of the lines named on the ticket should have power to alter, modify, or waive in any manner any of the conditions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. ColeOhio Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Railway Co. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  4. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Kansas Ry. Co. of Texas v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API