Legal Opinion
In Re the Extradition of Beresford-Redman
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 2, 2010No. CR 10-2780MPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DETENTION AND DENYING APPLICATION FOR BAIL (Docket No. 6)
SUZANNE H. SEGAL, United States Magistrate Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
On November 12, 2010, the United States of America (“the United States”) filed a Complaint for Provisional Arrest with a View Towards Extradition (the “Complaint”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3184. The Complaint alleged that Bruce Ainsley Beresford-Redman (“Beresford-Redman”) had been charged in the State of Quintana Roo, Mexico with aggravated homicide as described by articles 86, 106(1) and 14, and punishable under article 89 of the Penal Code of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wright v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Jeffrey Phillip Kamrin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Miguel Salerno v. United States of America, United States Attorney General, and United States Marshal for the Eastern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In the Matter of Extradition of Robert Henry Russell. United States of America v. Robert Henry RussellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. TaitzDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Extradition of GarciaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- In re the Extradition of AntonowiczDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- In re Extradition of BerrocalDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017