Legal Opinion

J. E. Haddock, Ltd. v. Pillsbury

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 15, 1945No. 23542-GPublished

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

The defendant Deputy Commissioner’s decision awarding compensation to the widow of a deceased employee rests upon his finding that the widow was, at the time of decedent’s death, living apart from him “for justifiable cause and by reason of his desertion at such time.” 33 U.S.C. A. §§ 902(16), 909(b).

Upon review, the court should not disturb the Commissioner’s finding and decision, if supported by substantial evidence. Crowell v. Benson, 285 U.S. 22, 46, 47, 52 S.Ct. 285, 76 L.Ed. 598; Voehl v. Indemnity Ins. Co., 288 U.S. 162, 166, 53 S.Ct. 380, 77 L.Ed. 676, 87…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Parker v. Motor Boat Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Webb v. . BuckelewNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API