Legal Opinion

Pacesetter Homes, Inc. v. Village of South Holland

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1959No. 35100, 35293PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Klingbiel

Aloysius Cisek and two other businessmen in the village of South Holland who operate a motel, a restaurant and a gasoline service station, respectively, together with two residents desiring to avail themselves of the formers’ accommodations or products, brought a declaratory judgment action in the circuit court of Cook County challenging the validity of South Holland’s Sunday closing ordinance. The court held the ordinance unconstitutional “in so far as it prohibits the businesses of the plaintiffs.” The village appeals directly to this court, upon certificate of the trial court that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. REESESupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Butts v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Eden v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. City of Mt. Vernon v. JulianIllinois Supreme Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Kroger Co. v. O'Hara TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Opyt's Amoco, Inc. v. Village of South HollandIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Harry's Hardware, Inc. v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API