Legal Opinion

Barron v. James

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1946No. 4315Published

1Opinion

Motion for Rehearing.

Defendants’ motion for rehearing Is now-before us:

*256(1) Under grounds 4 and 5 of said motion defendants assign error to the following statement on page 5 of our opinion: “As a matter of fact, it seems to he held in some decisions that if defendants expect to review an order overruling a plea of privilege on an appeal from a final judgment on the merits they must identify the order overruling the plea in the appeal bond. Clark v. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank, Tex.Civ.App., 153 S.W.2d 668; Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. v. Dyess, Tex.Civ.App., 167 S.W.2d 294.”

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. v. DyessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API