Legal Opinion

Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. v. Dyess

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1942No. 2291PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

Zurich General Accident and Liability Insurance Company, Ltd., sought an injunction from the District Court against Judge Richard Dyess, Mildred Beaty, Clerk of the County Court of Shackelford County, and J. R. Craighead, restraining them from enforcing a judgment rendered in the County Court of Shackelford County by said Special County Judge in a case in which Craighead was plaintiff and said Insurance Company was defendant. The District Court refused to enjoin the enforcement of said County Court judgment. Though rather lengthy, when reduced to its essentials, the petition…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Clayton v. HurtTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. DoweTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Smith Bros. Grain Co. v. WindsorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Odom v. McMahanTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Peden Iron & Steel Co. v. El Campo Rice Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Groce-Wearden Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Barron v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Barron v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Barron v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API