Legal Opinion

Duncan v. J. H. Corder & Son

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1936No. Civ. 10988; Civ. 10989PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

These appeals are prosecuted from judgments based upon verdicts of a jury. By stipulation the two cases were tried together and by agreement both appeals were consolidated for consideration together in this court. The accident out of which these actions arose occurred on the afternoon of August 3, 1935, between 3 and 4 o’clock, on that portion of U. S. Plighway No. 99 located between the towns of Gorman and Castaic. This portion of the highway extends in a general northerly and southerly direction, with a six per cent grade from south to north at and near the place of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Siemers v. EisenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Miller v. Royal Flint Glass WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Hunt v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. United States v. HammondDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Stickel v. DurfeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Ketchum v. PatteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Dawson v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Rangel v. BadolatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API