Legal Opinion

Yu Qin Zhu v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 20, 2017No. B278696PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKriegler, Acting P.J.

The *1035petitioner, an in-home caretaker, was riding her bicycle from one private home where she worked to another home where she was scheduled to work when she was struck and injured by a car. Her employer, the California State Department of Social Services (Department), paid the petitioner for working at both of these locations.

A majority of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (appeals board) concluded *632that the going and coming rule1 barred the petitioner's claim for workers' compensation benefits. However, the dissent and the workers' compensation judge (WCJ) found that the required…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Dimmig v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Kobe v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Schreifer v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chang v. So. Cal. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  2. Newland v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Newland v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API