Yu Qin Zhu v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtKriegler, Acting P.J.
The *1035petitioner, an in-home caretaker, was riding her bicycle from one private home where she worked to another home where she was scheduled to work when she was struck and injured by a car. Her employer, the California State Department of Social Services (Department), paid the petitioner for working at both of these locations.
A majority of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (appeals board) concluded *632that the going and coming rule1 barred the petitioner's claim for workers' compensation benefits. However, the dissent and the workers' compensation judge (WCJ) found that the required…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Dimmig v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Kobe v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Schreifer v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chang v. So. Cal. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- Newland v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Newland v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018