Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wentling v. Motorists Insurance Companies

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2004No. Nos. 2002-1742 and 2002-1783Published

1ConcurrenceLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 2} I agree with the majority that the judgment of the court of appeals should be vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings under Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mut. Ins. Co., 98 Ohio St.3d 186, 2002-Ohio-7217, 781 N.E.2d 927. Since we are vacating the court of appeals’ judgment, the conflict certified to this court under Proposition II will no longer exist. Although the Fifth District has reached conflicting conclusions on this issue (see Welsh v. Indiana Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2002CA00379, 2003-Ohio-5244, 2003 WL 22251403; Shirley v. Republic-Franklin Ins. Co., Stark App. No.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Shirley v. Republic-Franklin Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (10-3-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API