Legal Opinion

Poorman v. State Board of Equalization

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1935No. 7,428PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

On order to show cause, on the original application of Lulu J. Poorman, as administratrix of the estate of William H. Poorman, deceased, why the State Board of Equalization and the members thereof should not be permanently restrained and enjoined from collecting an income tax from the Poorman estate upon the salary paid to the deceased for a portion of the year 1934.

The Honorable William H. Poorman was elected as one of the judges of the first judicial district of the state of Montana at the general election in 1916, and was re-elected successively in 1920,1924,1928 and 1932; he died…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Collector v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1871

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gordy v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  2. du Pont v. GreenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
  3. Girard v. DefenbachIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. McClanahan v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Shubat v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API