Mason v. Barker
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING MOTION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
EISELE, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Amended Complaint. The Court has reviewed the submissions of the parties and, for the reasons set forth in this Order, will deny in part and grant in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and will grant Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Amended Complaint.
I. Background
Dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is appropriate only if it is beyond a reasonable doubt…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Strumph v. VenturaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Wyatt v. KrzysiakDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Estate of April Blackmon-Logan v. JenkinsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022