Legal Opinion

Mason v. Barker

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided September 18, 1997No. H-C-97-61PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING MOTION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

EISELE, District Judge.

Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Amended Complaint. The Court has reviewed the submissions of the parties and, for the reasons set forth in this Order, will deny in part and grant in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and will grant Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Amended Complaint.

I. Background

Dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is appropriate only if it is beyond a reasonable doubt…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of Strumph v. VenturaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  2. Wyatt v. KrzysiakDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1999
  3. Estate of April Blackmon-Logan v. JenkinsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API