Legal Opinion

Tiernan's Adm'r v. Minghini's Adm'r

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1886PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SnydeR, Judge :

In the year 1818 Luke Tiernau recovered against Joseppi Minghini, in the county court of Berkeley county, two judgments for $458.33 each, with interest and costs, upon which executions were duly issued. In 1819 Minghini filed his hill in- said court and enjoined the collection of said *315judgments, and this injunction continued in force until 1846. Minghini died intestate in 1825 possessed of a considerable estate, both real'and personal, and ho left surviving him a widow, Mary Minghini, who subsequently married one ■ Gregory, and he also left four children as his heirs-at-law,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newcomb v. BrooksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Handy v. Scott, Baker & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Buster v. HollandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Lloyd v. KyleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Douglass v. McCoyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stout v. Philippi Manufacturing & Mercantile Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Morgan v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Dunn's Ex'rs v. RenickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  5. Cresap v. CresapWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API