Buster v. Holland
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Statement by
GkeeN, Jud&e:
While the testimony in this cause is contradictory, and where not contradictory is often indefinite as to material facts, and while the pleadings too are often so vague as to be almost unintelligible, it seems to me we can collect from the entire record the substantial facts, out of which the controversy in this cause has arisen. Some of the facts occurred prior to'the institution of the suit, and others after the suit was commenced; and it is in this, as in most other cases, absolutely essential in deciding it, that we should distinguish the former from the latter.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Woods v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
- Lloyd v. KyleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- Werdenbaugh Adm'r v. ReidWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
- Hewitt v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1867
- Pecks v. ChambersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- Barbour v. TompkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Preston County Coke Co. v. Preston County Light & Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
- Poling v. FlanaganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Wait v. Homestead Building Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.