Vendette v. Feinberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in granting summary judgment to the defendant doctor in this medical malpractice action. Although defendant, by expert opinion evidence, sought to establish his entitlement to summary judgment (cf. Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 NY2d 851), plaintiff sufficiently opposed the motion by alleging defendant admitted to him that defendant misread an X ray revealing that the bones in plaintiff’s wrist had not fully healed. Such an admission of a party constitutes evidence in admissible…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Neuman v. GreensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Maust v. ArseneauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Pan v. CoburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adams v. AgrawalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Powell v. WohllebenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998