Legal Opinion · Dissent

Janelli v. Janelli

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 8, 1949No. 14017Published

1Dissent

BOND, Chief-Justice

(dissenting).

The opinion edited by our Justice Cramer recognizes this Court’s jurisdiction of this appeal in sustaining the action of the trial court on the basis of implied findings that' there was a marriage; hence the mandatory injunction of the trial court was proper and should not be disturbed on this appeal; and then finally concludes that “This Court has no jurisdiction and this appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction,” citing Beckler v. Beckler, Tex.Civ.App., 114 S.W.2d 618. Such finding and conclusion is also the holding of Mr. Justice Young in dissent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beckler v. BecklerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Janelli v. JanelliCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API