Legal Opinion
Manley v. Canterbury Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 10, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 1350PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This is an application under Rule 54 (d), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C., for the taxation of costs. For the convenience of counsel and due to unusual circumstances, the matter is not considered on review of any finding of the Clerk but by the Court in the first instance.
At the trial of this case a judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has asked that certain items, some eighteen in number, be taxed as costs. As to many of these such as Court costs, cost in connection with documents introduced in evidence at the trial, and translation of an exhibit…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Branfoot v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1892
- Hope Basket Co. v. Product Advancement Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
- Hansen v. BradleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1953
- Brookside Theatre Corp. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
- Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bank of America v. Loew's International CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Chemical Bank v. KimmelDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Clapper v. Original Tractor Cab CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1958
- Modick v. Carvel Stores of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Bowman v. West Disinfecting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.