Legal Opinion
Medunic v. Lederer
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 4, 1974No. Civ. A. No. 74-1002PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GORBEY, District Judge.
The defendant has filed a motion asking for relief from the consequences of having failed to plead or respond to a complaint as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
A chronology of events follows. The complaint, arising out of an automobile accident, was filed April 18, 1974, and was served on the defendant on May 2, 1974. The complaint was endorsed with notice to plead within twenty (20) days. *404On June 4, 1974, plaintiff filed a praecipe for judgment requesting the Clerk to enter a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff pursuant to Rule 55(c)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Fox v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- National Union Fire Insurance v. WanbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Robinson v. Bantam Books, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Nelson v. Coleman Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Monge v. Portofino RistoranteDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Eli L. Medunic and Dolores M. Medunic v. Louis W. LedererCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Oliver v. SawyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Spica v. GarczynskiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Developers Surety and Indemnity Company v. J&K Contracting, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.