Legal Opinion

Smith v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 1, 2007No. 07-1066PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per CuBratton, has

Debra Smith, by her attorney, Melissa Dorn Bratton, has filed a Motion to Amend the Notice of Appeal and Stay the Briefing Schedule. While captioned as a motion to amend the notice of appeal, Smith moves this court for relief from Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 6-9(b)(2)(d) which requires that a notice of appeal be signed by the appellant, if an adult, and by counsel. The notice of appeal in this case was signed by Smith’s counsel Tom Garner; however, it was not signed by Smith. While Smith asserts a right to move to amend the notice and add the signature, this court has treated this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Martin v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garcia v. ARK. DEP. OF HEALTH AND HUM. SER.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Garcia v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Holloway v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Jones v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Pacheco v. Arkansas Department of Health and Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API