McKusick v. Seymour, Sabin & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by D. M. Sabin, C. N. Nelson, George E. Finch, and others, former stockholders of Seymour, Sabin & Co., from an order of the district court, Washington county, made July 16, 1891, overruling their demurrer to the supplemental complaint of the Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Company, filed in the insolvency proceeding pending against said first-named corporation.
Read the full summary
Appeal by D. M. Sabin, C. N. Nelson, George E. Finch, and others, former stockholders of Seymour, Sabin & Co., from an order of the district court, Washington county, made July 16, 1891, overruling their demurrer to the supplemental complaint of the Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Company, filed in the insolvency proceeding pending against said first-named corporation. This is another supplemental complaint filed under 1878 G. S. ch. 76, § 16, by the Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Company in the same action mentioned in the preceding case, ante, p. 158. This complaint stated that on May…
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This appeal is from an order overruling a demurrer to another “supplemental complaint” filed by the Minnesota Thresher Company in the sequestration proceeding against the corporation Seymour, Sabin & Co. The subject is to compel the stockholders to account for certain “stock” in the Northwestern Manufacturing & Car Company, which belonged to Seymour, Sabin & Co., and which is alleged to have been assigned to and distributed among them in 1882, without their paying anything therefor except their own stock in Seymour, Sabin & Co., which they surrendered, and which the officers of that…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Spencer v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Barnes v. Spencer & Barnes Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Hartley v. . Pioneer Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- In re AllenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926