Legal Opinion
Forsyth v. HP Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 7, 2020No. 5:16-cv-04775Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DONNA J. FORSYTH, et al., 8 Case No. 5:16-cv-04775-EJD Plaintiffs, 9 ORDER DENYING BRYANT v. FONSECA’S MOTION TO 10 INTERVENE AS A PLAINTIFF HP INC., et al., 11 Re: Dkt. No. 346 Defendants. 12 13 On August 18, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a putative class action alleging that Defendants 14 violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), California Fair Employment and 15 Housing Act (“FEHA”), and other California laws. Complaint ¶ 4, Dkt. 1. Bryant Fonseca 16 (“Fonseca”) seeks to intervene in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kobold v. Good Samaritan Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Donnelly v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Trujillo v. North County Transit Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Wilderness Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.