Levitt v. Maynard
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
The plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that the apportionment of senatorial districts by the method provided in the State Constitution and the manner provided by Laws 1961, c. 273 is unconstitutional, and in particular in violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Procedurally we pause only momentarily. “For more than half a century pleading and procedure in this jurisdiction has been a means to an end and it should never become more important than the purpose which it seeks to accomplish.” Ricker v. Mathews, 94 N. H. 313, 318.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bain Peanut Co. of Tex. v. PinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Scholle v. HareSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lisco v. LoveDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1963
- Grinnell v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Jackman v. BodineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- In re MoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- Boehner v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.