Legal Opinion

Hazo v. Geetz

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 74-1262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MARSH, District Judge.

This matter is presently before us on motions to dismiss the complaint filed by each of the three named defendants.* Plaintiff, Hazo, is an individual resident of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, who trades and does business as Moses Hazo Company, a business dealing in the sale of antique rugs and furniture and objects d’art. Defendant, Mary E. Geltz (hereinafter referred to as Geltz), is an individual resident of Verona, Pennsylvania; defendant, Edward E. Burkhardt (hereinafter referred to as Burkhardt), is an individual resident of Pennsylvania and is an…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  4. Sylvester Lockhart, Jr. v. Charles A. Hoenstine, Prothonotary of the Superior Court of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  5. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harley v. OliverDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API