Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Moore

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 4, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Petition to the Hartford Municipal Court, Windsor County, for a new trial on the ground of fraud, accident, and mistake. Heard by Court, A. G. Whitham, Municipal Judge. The Court made the order: ‘ ‘ Judgment that the execution against the trustee in said cause of Moore v. Kinne, No. 270, be stayed”;' but no findings of fact were made nor complete judgment rendered. The petitionee excepted.

1Opinion of the CourtMiles, J.

This is a petition to the Hartford municipal court, for a new trial on the ground of fraud, accident, and mistake. The petition was heard by the court, and certain of the petitioner’s testimony was recited by the court; but no finding of fact was made thereon nor complete judgment rendered. The record simply shows the following: “Judgment that the execution against the trustee in said cause of Moore v. Kinne No. 270 be stayed.” No judgment against the trustee is set aside nor is a new trial granted as prayed for in the petition, but simply an unlimited stay of the petitionee’s execution is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Probate Court v. ChapinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  2. Jameson v. PaddockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1842

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beam v. FishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  2. Collins v. Estate of CollinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  3. Price v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API