Legal Opinion

Comparato v. Wegman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against defendant Julie B. Wegman, but erred in denying that part of the motion against defendant Wayne F. Wegman. Where a debt is composed of several items, absent a direction by the debtor, the creditor may apply a voluntary payment by the debtor “as it sees fit and to its best advantage” (Home & City Sav. Bank v Bilinski, 177 AD2d 73, 76; see also, Gerrity Co. v Riscica,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Home & City Savings Bank v. BilinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Gerrity Co. v. RiscicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API