Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Pellegrini

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 12, 1989Published

1DissentLiacos, J.

The court today rules, ante at 88, that a search warrant, which a judge inadvertently failed to sign, is valid because the absence of the judge’s signature “should be deemed a ministerial defect which does not invalidate the warrant.”* 1 I dissent.

*92A search warrant unsigned by a judge is a nullity, void on its face, and void ab initio. Kelley v. State, 55 Ala. App. 402, 403 (1975). State v. Vuin, 185 N.E.2d 506, 510 (Ohio Ct. C.P. 1962). See State v. Spaw, 18 Ohio App. 3d 77, 79 (1984). Such a warrant is invalid because “it shows on its face that it lacks the signature of any [judge or]…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. William D. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. SheppardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. State v. CochraneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. SurowieckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API