Legal Opinion

State v. Surowiecki

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 5, 1981PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmentano, J.

The facts are not in dispute. On September 27,1978, a police sergeant of the Meriden police department submitted to a judge an application for a search and seizure warrant. The application requested judicial authorization for the search of the defendant’s person, automobile and apartment. The judge reviewed the application and found that it established probable cause for a search of the areas listed and for a seizure of the items described. He administered the oath to the sergeant and signed the jurat on the application. He did not, however, affix his signature to the actual search warrant.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. State v. CochraneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. WILLIAMSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Byrd v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  5. State v. FlemingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. PellegriniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. United States v. LevinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  5. State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API