Legal Opinion

Calvada, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. Henry Martuscello, J.

This is a motion, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss each of the three causes of action in the third amended complaint on the ground that said causes of action are insufficient in law, or in the alternative, to strike out certain matter from each pursuant to rule 103, on the ground that such matter is sham, frivolous, etc., and with respect to the first cause of action, to require plaintiff to separately state and number causes of action claimed to be improperly commingled in paragraph 21-d of said complaint.

The first cause of action is for damages…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Potomac Insurance Company v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Shahood v. CavinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Lerman v. LermanNew York Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API