Legal Opinion
Sherman, Taff & Bangert, P.C. v. Clark Equipment Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 2, 2004No. WD 62503PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.
Clark Equipment Company is balking at paying more than $96,000 in attorney fees and interest to law firm, Sherman, Taff and Bangert, P.C. Clark Equipment asserts that, although Wayne Taff, a member of the law firm, represented it in three lawsuits, another company — Clark Material Handling, a former subsidiary corporation — had hired Taff in fulfillment of its indemnity agreement with Clark Equipment and was responsible for the bill. The law firm sued Clark Equipment for breach of contract and, alternatively, for quantum meruit The circuit court rejected Clark…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mehra v. MehraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Brannaker v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Graue v. Missouri Property Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Cook v. PolineniMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Farmers' Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sieg v. International Environmental Management, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Bluehaven Funding, LLC v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Motorsport Marketing, Inc. v. Wiedmaier, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bluehaven Funding v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- International Environmental Management, Inc. v. United Corporate Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.