Davis v. . Gulley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
In Early v. Flour Mills, 187 N. C., p. 345, it is said: “It is the general rule in mercantile law that the risk of loss follows the title to the property. Joyce v. Adams, 8 N. Y., 291; note 26, L. R. A. (N. S.), 10. It is also the general holding that when a seller ships goods ‘order notify,’ and draws draft for purchase price, with bill of lading attached, the title and right of possession to the property are reserved by the seller until the draft is paid. No title passes to the purchaser, and any loss in transit, as between the buyer and the seller, must be borne by the latter. Collins v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Joyce v. . AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Richardson v. . WoodruffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Southern Railway Co. v. LathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. West Paving Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Armfield Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Richardson v. . WoodruffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919