Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. West Paving Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.
It is conceded that the freight charges here sued for were those contained in the legally applicable tariff schedules filed with the North Carolina Utilities Commission and were in effect at the time of the shipments referred to. Hence it follows that under well settled principles of law and in accord with the statutes enacted to prevent rebates and discrimination among shippers, and to provide equal and impartial service to all alike (G. S., 60-5; 60-6; 60-52; 60-114; 49 U.S.C.A. sec. 41 (3)), it was the duty of the plaintiff as a common carrier of freight to collect the full amount at the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Wilson v. Carolina Builders of Wilson, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Atlantic Coast Line R. v. Wannamaker Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Norfolk Southern Railroad v. New Bern Iron Works & Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916