Legal Opinion
Crane v. Secretary of the Army
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 15, 2000No. 1:96-cv-00418PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
CURTIN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Paul E. Crane alleges that defendant, the Secretary of the Army, violated the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 551, and his constitutional right to due process by involuntarily dismissing him from the United States Army. Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiffs complaint. Plaintiff opposes and cross-moves for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied and plaintiffs motion is granted.
FACTS
I. Background Facts
In May of 1980, Crane was commissioned as a Second Lieutenant in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Brezler v. MillsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Brezler v. MillsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Nation v. DaltonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Daugherty v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.